Showing posts with label survey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label survey. Show all posts

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Now that the project is mostly complete, and all web sites have been migrated from Collage to echoCI, we'd like to get a better idea for improvements in users' experience with the new system.   


In the next few weeks, University employees will receive a link to a survey to provide feedback on echoCI. Anecdotally we've been receiving lots of positive feedback, and we believe this survey will verify these reports.



Monday, November 30, 2009

This morning, the results of the Web Content Management (WCM) survey were sent to the Core Group for review. There were 136 total responses from the community.

There weren't many surprises revealed by the survey; it helped to clarify and confirm many existing perceptions. The results will be especially useful in the future, as we now have a benchmark for the level of satisfaction with our current WCM system.

Here are some things we observed in the results:

Many of our web content creators don’t have a lot of prior experience working on web sites. Less than 50% of respondents who are currently using the system had ever worked on a Web site before.

People with less web experience seem to like the WCM more. Collage users who have beginner-level web skills or who had never worked on a web site prior to Collage are 17-39% more satisfied with Collage than people that have prior experience working on web sites.

Our WCM users probably don't have sufficient modern web design skills. While 70% of respondents claim that they have at least a beginner’s understanding of the principles and practices of modern web design, and 80% consider themselves "intermediate" or "advanced" for most Windows + MS Word skills, the results suggest that only 20% likely possess the skills to successfully perform modern Web design tasks.

Overall satisfaction with the system is largely neutral,with the remainder closely split with a slight edge to satisfied users.

Most respondents consider our current WCM easy to use, and like the consistency it creates. Most positive comments about Collage’s strengths were about ease of use and consistency.

Respondents remarked on these weaknesses of our current WCM (in order of importance):

  1. Editing and publishing speed. Collage is not fast enough.
  2. Insufficient formatting controls. People want to do more with fonts color, styles, and layout.
  3. Browser compatibility. Needs to work well and consistently across browsers & platforms.
  4. Clunky administrative interface. It should be more streamlined and focused on only the tasks a user needs.
  5. The built-in editing tool. Should provide better/more editing control.
Most people that use the WCM understand how to it. Most feel that they have received sufficient training to use Collage effectively on a day-to-day basis.

More detailed analysis has been provided to the Core Group for further review.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

We're received 91 replies to date; thank you to those CI employees that have participated in the WCM survey thus far. For those that haven't, the survey will be open through the end of October. We appreciate all feedback; we want to make sure that we're selecting a system that best fits the needs of the University community, and we can only do that if people tell us what they need, what works and what doesn't.

The review of products Phase 1 of the evaluation and selection process will begin soon.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

The 2009 WCM Survey was sent out this afternoon to all CI employees via campus email. We look forward to hearing back from the community about the current system and the features that we should focus on in a new system.

Regardless of which system is selected, key policy and procedure issues need to be resolved prior to system implementation. These include answers to questions such as:

  • Who will use the WCM?
  • Who is required to use the new WCM, i.e., which persons/organizations/Web sites/etc.?
  • What alternatives will be provided for those who don't wish to use (or who can't, for some reason) use the new WCM?
  • What are the expectations for how the system will be used? What processes will change, and which will stay the same?
  • How will support be provided: who will provide it, and at what levels of financial and human support?
  • How will the University ensure that WCM users have the skills and tools to use the WCM successfully?
  • How will the success of the new WCM be evaluated?
Members of the Core Team will be meeting in the coming weeks to discuss these inter-related issues. The answers to these decisions will also help direct the evaluation and selection process.

Feel free to email us with your thoughts about other issues we should consider. You can contact us at webmaster@csuci.edu.